How we change what others think, feel, believe and do
BUY IN: how to procure compliance, and why it seems difficult
Guest articles > BUY IN: how to procure compliance, and why it seems difficult
by: Sharon Drew Morgen
Have you ever attempted to implement a procedure with a group, or move toward some sort of change that everyone approved of, or get a prospect, client, or patient to agree to adopt a new solution and ultimately fail due to lack of Buy In? It happens all the time:
97% of software implementations are considered failures (and itâ€™s blamed on the group).
The sales model fails to close 95% of assumed buyers, even those who really need their services (and itâ€™s blamed on the â€˜stupidâ€™ buyer).
Coaches lose clients who didnâ€™t get the results they wanted (and itâ€™s assumed the clients didnâ€™t really want to change).
Negotiations rarely end up with both sides feeling they were treated fairly (and itâ€™s blamed on the Other being selfish/vindictive, etc.).
Healthcare practitioners fail to convince ill patients to switch to lifesaving regimens (and itâ€™s blamed on the patient not wanting to be healthy).
In each of the above situations, Buy In, permanent Behavior change, compliance, and better decision making could have easily been facilitated by the Influencer. But not with the approaches used.
THE COST OF NON-COMPLIANCE
Failure to elicit Buy In is costly. We certainly try: to ensure success we encourage open dialogue, pose questions, request suggestions; we provide necessary details, data, and incontrovertible reasons; we carefully data-gather to ensure we understand the full fact patterns involved in any change; we request new Behaviors that will implement the new ideas. And yet something happens between our efforts and Anotherâ€™s actions. Whatâ€™s happening? Weâ€™re:
As Influencers weâ€™re pushing from the outside before the inside is addressed; weâ€™re requesting modifications from the very place that created and maintains the issue we seek to change, in a way that could cause instability.
To garner Buy In and avoid resistance, itâ€™s necessary to help the status quo - the underlying system of rules, Beliefs, relationships, goals, people, etc. - configure its own change process before we begin our implementation, or close a sale, or modify eating/exercising habits for patients (or or or). Currently when we try to influence Others, weâ€™re attempting to CAUSE change to comply with OUR goals â€“ pushing from the outside/in â€“ and unwittingly pushing against the normalized status quo which will automatically resist. Sort of like trying to convince a forward-moving robot to move backward before reprogramming it.
To get real change with no resistance, to garner Buy In, agreement and permanent compliance, we need to help Others ELICIT their own change - inside/out. We need to help others reprogram themselves. And just like with a robot, we cannot do it as outsiders pushing our agendas against their established norms.
INFORMATION DOESNâ€™T ELICIT CHANGE
Our current process to elicit Buy In includes sharing information about our goal: we offer the right details, at the right time, presented the right way, with the right languaging, assuming people will understand its importance and generate new Behaviors. Weâ€™re offering what WE want them to know and do, so they will take the action WE want them to take (but may initially seem damaging for them personally).
Information is useless as a stimulus for change until the underlying system that maintains the status quo has prepared itself to change and seeks that specific bit of data to complete new activity. So the robot wouldnâ€™t need verbal instructions from us to move backwards when confronted with a wall, for example, until it already had the capability of moving backward. The robot will break, or just stop working, if we start by trying to push it backwards. Information is the very last thing needed once a route through to congruent change has been designed and the system understands the exact information it will require for Excellence.
Unfortunately, our efforts often fail because we use reasoning, rationale, stories, scientific arguments, numbers crunching, etc. as the â€˜rational explanationâ€™ to incur Behavior change and compliance. I was once consulting with Inside Sales at Bethlehem Steel after they moved 90 people from their homes in individual states into one of two centers (Sparrows Point, MI, or Burns Harbor, MD). The Bethlehem Team had â€˜incontrovertible evidenceâ€™ that teams were more effective when working around each other. They gave the sales folks one month to move house, relocate, sell their homes and buy new ones, get new schools for their kids, etc. The people were furious. Many quit; some had heart attacks. One woman actually became â€˜emotionally blindâ€™. All were separated from their families and pets for months while family members were left behind to finish school, pack, sell their houses. My client couldnâ€™t understand why they were so upset. He had, he reasoned, paid all their expenses and gave them $5,000 for their upheaval. The information that detailed the reasoning wasnâ€™t the problem.
CHANGE IS AN INSIDE JOB
All systems (and each of us are a system) are set up to be stable and habitual as per Homeostasis. Systems canâ€™t even recognize anything is wrong, as they are self-perpetuating and ignorant of the problems theyâ€™ve already baked into the â€˜operatingâ€™ system. Fish donâ€™t recognize the water theyâ€™re in.
Before any change, or new decision, our unconscious system must be assured its norms will be preserved, its core objectives will be met, its Beliefs and core principles will be maintained, and it will suffer minimal disruption. Buy In requires the core norms and rules of the system remain intact; it demands systemic agreement for core change, and a reconfiguration of the habituated internal configuration that created and maintains the status quo (and the problem being resolved). Only when the system is reconfigured with new rules and Beliefs and norms, will it design the new output, choices, and Behaviors that we require.
The way weâ€™re going about it, weâ€™re inadvertently setting up non-compliance by pushing in against the norm before the system has determined how or why to make changes and actually causing the resistance we get. For congruent change and Buy In, (human) systems must design their own route to determining if they seek change, and if they do, they must understand how to reconfigure their unconscious norms in a way that maintains Systems Congruence; they will not, cannot, hear, understand, or apply what we want from them until all this is handled.
Our normal influencing and communication tools that collect data, share ideas, suggest new Behaviors, and promote dialogue challenge the status quo.
Until or unless every element that maintains the problem and causes the current Behaviors that need changing agree to, and have a route through to, change, no Buy In can occur.
BEHAVIORS ARE NOT THE WAY IN
Most people certainly are willing to change to become â€˜betterâ€™ if they know how to change without major disruption and that they'll maintain Systems Congruence. Change involves disrupting the status quo in a way that causes different Behaviors to emerge. But new Behaviors cannot emerge without the foundation that stimulates them changing as well. Changing behaviors is not so simple as changing behaviors.
Behaviors do not exist in a vacuum. They are merely the output, the translation, of our unconscious Belief system â€“ we â€˜doâ€™ what we â€˜doâ€™ because our system needs a physical representation of who we are. Because weâ€™re each unique, we each exhibit different Behaviors to interpret our unconscious Beliefs. And an outsider sees only the output (i.e. the action, the Behaviors) without understanding the underlying values that created them. I repeat, as this is a hard one: there is no way for an outsider to understand, or change, Anotherâ€™s Behaviors because the system that developed them is unique for each person.
To enable agreement and change, we must facilitate the Other to change its own system, to design new Behaviors, and re-assess the norms, rules, and Beliefs that developed the Behaviors to begin with. There are actually 13 steps necessary for real change to occur. Iâ€™ve coded these steps of change and have scaled them, teaching them in the sales and coaching fields (as Buying FacilitationÂ® over the past 35 years. The Change Facilitation model Iâ€™ve developed gives influencers the tools to
For Buy In and compliance, we must stop trying to influence or cause the change, but enable Others to develop their own change. It might not look exactly like we hoped, but it will carry our goals forward in a way that becomes a welcome part of the status quo, habituated and accepted immediately. Healthcare providers will elicit permanent healthy Behaviors from patients; buyers will know how to buy quickly; implementations will occur effortlessly and quickly. Our problem has been our focus on changing Behaviors our way. Letâ€™s enable Others to design their own change. And then they will happily Buy In to becoming their own brand of Excellence.
Sharon Drew Morgen is the visionary behind Buying FacilitationÂ® - a change management model that includes learning how to Listen for Systems, formulating Facilitative Questions, and understanding the steps of systemic change. For those of you wishing to learn more, take a look at the program syllabus. Please visit www.dirtylittlesecrets.com and read the two free chapters. Consider reading it with the companion ebook Buying FacilitationÂ®
Sharon Drew is the author of the NYTimes Business Bestseller Selling With Integrity, as well as 6 other books on helping buyers buy. She is also the author of the Amazon bestseller What? Did you really say what I think I heard? Sharon Drew keynotes, trains and coaches sales teams to help them unlock situations that are stalled, and teaches teams how to present and prospect by facilitating the complete buying decision process. She delivers keynotes at annual sales conferences globally. Sharon Drew can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org 512 771 1117
Contributor: Sharon Drew Morgen
Published here on: 25-Nov-18
And the big