changingminds.org

How we change what others think, feel, believe and do

 

Disciplines

 

Techniques

 

Principles

 

Explanations

 

Theories

 

 

Home

 

Blog!

 

Quotes

 

Guest articles

 

Analysis

 

Books

 

Help us

 

Links

 

 

 

Affirming the Consequent

 

Disciplines Argument > Fallacies > Affirming the Consequent

Description | Discussion | Example | See also

 

Description

If A is true then B is true. B is true. Therefore A is true.

If B follows A, then you can assume you can go back the other way also.

Example

I am in London, England. I am in England, therefore I am in London.

If you are cheating on me, you will be out of the house a lot. You are out of the house a lot, so you must be cheating on me.

Discussion

This assumes that an if...then... statement is commutative, that given 'If A then B', you can also reverse it to 'If B then A'. The B, or 'then' part of the statement is called the 'consequent' (the A is the antecedent).

Affirming the Consequent is one of Aristotle's 13 fallacies.

Classification

Non-sequitur, Syllogistic

See also

Denying the Antecedent

 

And the big
paperback book


Add/share/save:


 

 


Save the rain


 

 


SalesProCentral

 

Contact Caveat About Students Webmasters Awards Guestbook Feedback Sitemap Changes

 

 

  © Changing Minds 2002-2012

  Massive Content -- Maximum Speed

TOP

.