Changing
Minds
.org

How we change what others think, feel, believe and do

 

Disciplines

 

Techniques

 

Principles

 

Explanations

 

Theories

 

 

Home

 

Blog!

 

Quotes

 

Guest articles

 

Analysis

 

Books

 

Guestbook

 

Links

 

 

Now, you can buy
the real book!

Add/share/save
this page:

Add to Google

 

 


Save the rain


 

 

 

Composition

 

Disciplines Argument > Fallacies > Composition

Description | Discussion | Example | See also

 

Description

If A is X and B is X then the group to which A and B belong are all X.

Given a number of unrelated items, they are taken as being members of a distinct group, about which general attributes may be identified.

These attributes may well be taken from a limited number of items or parts and generalized up to the whole.

Example

All people in this town are idiots.

These two tools are blunt. The whole box of tools must be blunt.

Oxygen and hydrogen are gases at room temperature. Therefore water (H20) is a gas at room temperature.

Discussion

This seeks to use inductive reasoning, but does so falsely, generalizing when there is no sound rationale for doing so. This is the basis of stereotyping, which is a Composition fallacy.

The generalization that is taking place may be due to sloppy thinking or may be a deliberate way of seeking a general rule (which may then be applied deductively elsewhere).

Composition is one of Aristotle's 13 fallacies.

Classification

Ambiguity, Analogy, Inductive, Linguistic

Also known as

Generalization, Faulty Induction

See also

Division, Inductive reasoning, Stereotypes

 

Contact Caveat About Students Webmasters Awards Guestbook Feedback Sitemap Changes

 

 

  © Syque 2002-2010

TOP

Massive Content -- Maximum Speed