ChangingMinds Web 

         

Home

Disciplines

Techniques

Principles

Explanations

Theories

Blog!

Quotes

Guest articles

Analysis

Book Reviews

Bookshop

Links

Caveat

Changes

Students!

Webmasters!

Contact

About

Guestbook

Site Map

Share this page:

 

 

Books and
more at:

USA:

In association with amazon.com

UK:

In Association with Amazon.co.uk

Canada:

In Association with amazon.ca

 

 

Post Hoc

 

Disciplines Argument > Fallacies > Post Hoc

Description | Discussion | Example | See also

 

Description

If X follows Y, then X is caused by Y.

The sequence of things proves cause.

Example

The man pulled out a gun. A shot was fired. Therefore the man fired the shot.

You used the telephone and then it stopped working. You broke the phone.

I am feeling very unwell. It must have been the meal last night.

Discussion

Just because something follows something else, this is not sufficient evidence to prove true cause and effect. This temporal relationship may simply be coincidence.

Coincidence is often related to superstition -- hence saying 'bless you' when someone sneezes (it is assumed that this lays a person open to spiritual attack) or throwing salt over your shoulder when you spill it (it is assumed to cause bad luck otherwise).

Classification

Assumptive, Causal

Also known as

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc (after this, therefore because of this)

See also

Gambler's Fallacy

 


 

  © Syque 2002-2007

TOP

Massive Content -- Maximum Speed