changingminds.org

How we change what others think, feel, believe and do

 

Disciplines

 

Techniques

 

Principles

 

Explanations

 

Theories

 

 

Home

 

Blog!

 

Quotes

 

Guest articles

 

Analysis

 

Books

 

Help us

 

Links

 

 

Please help
and share:

 

Categorical Propositions

 

Disciplines Argument > Categorical Propositions

Definitions | Four types | Opposites | See also

 

Classical logic makes great use of the principle of putting things into categories, or classes. Categorical propositions tell you things about these categories.

Definitions

Categorical term

A categorical term is something that will be categorized, such as 'dog' and 'cat'. It is usually a collective statement such as 'all dogs' or 'some dogs'.

Categorical proposition

A categorical proposition is simply a statements about the relationship between categories. It states whether one category or categorical term is fully contained with another, is partially contained within another or is completely separate.

A dog is an animal

Some dogs are friendly

No dog is a cat

Propositions may have quality: either affirmative or negative.

They may also have quantity: such as 'a', 'some', 'most' or 'all'. The 'all' quantity is also described as being universal and other quantities particular.

Predicate and subject

The first term in the proposition is the subject. The second term is the predicate.

Some dogs (subject) are friendly (predicate)

Distribution

A categorical term is said to be distributed if the categorical proposition that contains it says something about all members of that categorical term. It is undistributed if the categorical proposition that contains it says does not something about all members of that categorical term.

Four types

There are four types of categorical proposition, each of which is given a vowel letter A, E, I and O. A way of remembering these is: Affirmative universal, nEgative universal, affIrmative particular and nOgative particular. To be more correct, A and I letters came from the Latin affirmo, and E and O from the Latin nego.

 

Form Type Quality Quantity Distribution of X Distribution of Y
All X is Y A Affirmative Universal Distributed Undistributed
No X is Y E Negative Universal Distributed Distributed
Some X is Y I Affirmative Particular Undistributed Undistributed
Some X is not Y O Negative Particular Undistributed Distributed

 

In this classification, 'some X is some Y' is I and 'some X is not some Y' is O, although it can be argued that these may be treated as an additional two variants.

Opposites

There are several types of opposition used in categorical propositions. These can be traditionally placed in the Square of Opposition.

 


A

 

<-- Contraries --> E
^

|

Subalterns

|

V

Contradictories
(diagaonals)
^

|

Subalterns

|

V


I

 

<-- Subcontraries --> O

 

  • Contraries cannot both be true, but both can be false.
  • Subcontraries cannot both be false, but both can be true.
  • Subaltern pairs can both be true or both be false.
  • Contradictories cannot both be true and cannot both be false.

Opposites are also described in the converse, obverse and contrapositive.

Converse

The converse of a categorical proposition is categorical proposition where the predicate and subject of the original proposition are exchanged. Note that the quantity does not move with the subject or predicate.

No dogs are cats  -->  No cats are dogs

Some dogs are friendly creatures  -->  Some friendly creatures are dogs

All dogs are animals  -->  All animals are dogs

The converse of any true E or I proposition is also true (making it a useful test). A and O converses are seldom true.

Obverse

The obverse of a categorical proposition has predicate term replaced with its complement and quality of the proposition reverse.

All dogs are animals  -->  No dogs are not animals

No dogs are not dangerous  -->  All dogs are dangerous

The obverse of all types of true categorical proposition are also true.

Contrapositive

The contrapositive of a categorical proposition is formed by taking the complement of both subject and predicate and then reversing them.

All dogs are animals  -->  All non-animals are not dogs

Some dogs are friendly  -->  Some non-friendly creatures are not dogs

The contrapositive of any true A or O proposition is also true (making it a useful test). Contrapositives of E and I propositions are seldom true.

See also

Categorical syllogism, Set Theory

More Kindle books:

And the big
paperback book


Add/share/save:


 

 


Save the rain


 

 


SalesProCentral

 

Contact Caveat About Students Webmasters Awards Guestbook Feedback Sitemap Changes

 

 

Quick links

Disciplines

* Argument

Brand management

* Change Management

Coaching
+
Communication

Counseling

Game Design

+ Human Resources

+ Job-finding

* Leadership

Marketing

Politics

+ Propaganda

+ Rhetoric

* Negotiation

* Psychoanalysis

* Sales

Sociology

+ Storytelling

+ Teaching

Warfare

Workplace design

 

Techniques

+ Assertiveness

* Body language

* Change techniques

* Closing techniques

+ Conversation

Confidence tricks

* Conversion

* Creative techniques

* General techniques

+ Happiness

+ Hypnotism

+ Interrogation

* Language

+ Listening

* Negotiation tactics

* Objection handling

+ Propaganda

* Problem-solving

* Public speaking

+ Questioning

Using repetition

* Resisting persuasion

+ Self-development

Sequential requests

Stress Management

* Tipping

Using humor

* Willpower

Principles

+ Principles

Explanations

* Behaviors

+ Beliefs

Brain stuff

Conditioning

+ Coping Mechanisms

+ Critical Theory

+ Culture

Decisions

* Emotions

Evolution

Gender

+ Games

Groups

+ Identity

+ Learning

Meaning

Memory

Motivation

+ Models

* Needs

+ Personality

+ Power

* Preferences

+ Research

Relationships

+ SIFT Model

+ Social Research

Stress

+ Trust

+ Values

Theories

* Alphabetic list

* Theory types

 


  Changing Minds 2002-2013

  Massive Content -- Maximum Speed

TOP

.