How we change what others think, feel, believe and do
Fiedler's Least Preferred Co-worker (LPC) Theory
Leaders prioritize between task-focus and people-focus.
Relationships, power and task structure are the three key factors that drive effective styles.
Fiedler identified the a Least Preferred Co-Worker scoring for leaders by asking them first to think of a person with which they worked that they would like least to work with again, and then to score the person on a range of scales between positive factors (friendly, helpful, cheerful, etc.) and negative factors (unfriendly, unhelpful, gloomy, etc.). A high LPC leader generally scores the other person as positive and a low LPC leader scores them as negative.
High LPC leaders tend to have close and positive relationships and act in a supportive way, even prioritizing the relationship before the task. Low LPC leaders put the task first and will turn to relationships only when they are satisfied with how the work is going.
Three factors are then identified about the leader, member and the task, as follows:
The best LPC approach depends on a combination of there three. Generally, a high LPC approach is best when leader-member relations are poor, except when the task is unstructured and the leader is weak, in which a low LPC style is better.
This approach seeks to identify the underlying beliefs about people, in particular whether the leader sees others as positive (high LPC) or negative (low LPC). The neat trick of the model is to take someone where it would be very easy to be negative about them.
This is another approach that uses task- vs. people-focus as a major categorisation of the leader's style.
Fiedler, F.E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In L.
Berkowitz (ed), Advances in experimental social psychology, NY:
Fiedler, F.E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness, NY: McGraw-Hill
And the big