Acquiescence Effect

Description

When asked a question by another person, our answer is based not just on a rational consideration of what is being asked. In particular, our identity needs lead us to consider how we will appear to others.

We thus will tend to answer more in the positive rather than the negative, particularly if a leading question is used. We seek to acquiesce to the needs and direction of others, particularly when:

They seem to be a superior in some way.

They have a need whereby we can easily help them.

Answering the question fully seems like hard work.

People thus tend to agree with one-sided statements. They will also agree with two contradictory statements when they are framed for agreement.

Example

If you were asked 'Do you think the government makes mistakes?', you may well say yes. If you were asked whether the government generally gets it right, you may also agree.

Lawyers will ask complex questions of people in the witness box, who may give in and agree rather try to unravel what is being asked of them.

A butcher asks a customers 'Do you want the best cut?'. The customers agrees.

Quick links

Acquiescence Effect

Description

Example

So What?

Using it

Defending

See also

References

Site Menu

You can buy books here

Quick links

Disciplines

Techniques

Principles

Explanations

Theories

And

Site Menu

Quick links

Disciplines

Techniques

Principles

Explanations

Theories

And