How we change what others think, feel, believe and do |
Limits to Repetition
Techniques > General persuasion > Using repetition > Limits to Repetition Number | Obviousness | Validity | See also
Repetition is a useful principle in persuasion, yet it has its limits in terms of when, where and how it is effective. NumberIf you repeat something endlessly to someone, they may eventually be persuaded. They may also become bored or irritated and so react against you, effectively in revenge for being so annoying. Research has shown that in general, three to five repetitions is enough (Briņol et al, 2008) and after that its effects either tail off or lead to reactance. ObviousnessReactance can also happen if the other person thinks you are trying to manipulate them. This does not take long with in-your-face obvious nagging. When a person is verbally repeating and another person is listening carefully, then repetition soon becomes noticeable. Repetition is often better if you are being subtle, aiming at the unconscious mind (Moons et al, 2008). This may be done with such as alliteration or tonal patterns. ValidityIf the argument being offered in the persuasion makes sense and is easier to agree with, then repetition should generally enhance and not weaken this power. On the other hand, if a weak and invalid argument is being used, then repetition will not make it stronger, although it may be even more necessary if the goal is to wear the other person down and get acceptance rather than real agreement. SourceThe credibility of the person making the argument is important. The more authority and trust they have, the more likely it is that the listener will be persuaded by them and will accept repetition as a sincere and important form of emphasis. If only one person is saying something, especially if they have no particular credibility, then it is far less persuasive than if the same thing is heard from other people. In fact there is a huge leap in credibility when two people are making the same point, as opposed to just one. Credibility flattens off after a few people are supporting the argument and only takes a final hike when everybody (in a given group) agrees. See also
Briņol, P., DeMarree, K. G., & Petty, R. E. (2008). Processes by which Confidence (vs. Doubt) Influence the Self. In R. Arkin, K. Oleson, & P. Carroll (Eds), The uncertain self: A handbook of perspectives from social and personality psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Moons, Wesley G.; Mackie, Diane M.; Garcia-Marques, Teresa (2009). The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1, 2-44
|
Site Menu |
| Home | Top | Quick Links | Settings | |
Main sections: | Disciplines | Techniques | Principles | Explanations | Theories | |
Other sections: | Blog! | Quotes | Guest articles | Analysis | Books | Help | |
More pages: | Contact | Caveat | About | Students | Webmasters | Awards | Guestbook | Feedback | Sitemap | Changes | |
Settings: | Computer layout | Mobile layout | Small font | Medium font | Large font | Translate | |
| Home | Top | Menu | Quick Links | |
|