ChangingMinds Web 

         

Home

Disciplines

Techniques

Principles

Explanations

Theories

Blog!

Quotes

Guest articles

Analysis

Book Reviews

Bookshop

Links

Caveat

Changes

Students!

Webmasters!

Contact

About

Guestbook

Site Map

Share this page:

 

 

Books and
more at:

USA:

In association with amazon.com

UK:

In Association with Amazon.co.uk

Canada:

In Association with amazon.ca

 

 

Modus Tollens

 

Disciplines Argument > Syllogisms > Modus Tollens

Description | Example | Discussion | See also

 

Description

If X is true then Y is true.

Y is false.

Therefore X is false.

Example

If there is smoke, there is fire. There is not fire, so there is no smoke.

If I am happy, then I smile. I am not smiling, therefore I am not happy.

Discussion

Modus Tollens is not as straightforward as its companion, Modus Ponens. Although common in argument, a Modus Tollens is not necessarily true, as the major premise (If X is true then Y is true) says nothing about falsehood. If, however, X and Y are bivalent (both can be either true or false) and X can only be true if Y is true, then the Modus Tollens stands.

Modus Tollens is the root of falsification, as proposed by Karl Popper and since used as the cornerstone of scientific proof.

This is also known as Denying the Consequent, as Y, the consequent is being denied as being true.

See also

Conditional Reasoning, Denying the Antecedent, Affirming the Consequent,

 

Modus Ponens

 


 

  © Syque 2002-2007

TOP

Massive Content -- Maximum Speed