ChangingMinds Web 

         

Home

Disciplines

Techniques

Principles

Explanations

Theories

Blog!

Quotes

Guest articles

Analysis

Book Reviews

Bookshop

Links

Caveat

Changes

Students!

Webmasters!

Contact

About

Guestbook

Site Map

Share this page:

 

 

Books and
more at:

USA:

In association with amazon.com

UK:

In Association with Amazon.co.uk

Canada:

In Association with amazon.ca

 

 

Mehrabian's communication study

 

Explanations > Behaviors > Understanding body language > Mehrabian's communication study

 

There is an oft-quoted (and often mis-quoted) study by Albert Mehrabian on how people decide whether they like one another.

The studies

Mehrabian and his colleagues were seeking to understand the relative impact of facial expressions and spoken words.

Study 1

Subjects were asked to listen to a recording of a female saying the single word 'maybe' in three tones of voice to convey liking, neutrality and disliking.

The subjects were then shown photos of female faces with the same three emotions and were asked to guess the emotions in the recorded voices, the photos and both in combination.

The photos got more accurate responses than the voice, by a ratio of 3:2.

Study 2

Subjects listened to nine recorded words, three conveying liking (honey, dear and thanks), three conveying neutrality (maybe, really and oh) and three conveying disliking (don’t, brute and terrible).

The words were spoken with different tonalities and subjects were asked to guess the emotions behind the words as spoken. The experiment finding was that tone carried more meaning than the individual words themselves.

The misunderstanding

Mehrabian concluded the following formula from these studies:

 

Total Liking = 7% Verbal Liking + 38% Vocal Liking + 55% Facial Liking

 

This is subsequently generalized to mean that in all communications:

  • 7% happens in spoken words.
  • 38% happens through voice tone.
  • 55% happens via general body language.

Of course this cannot be true: does an email only convey 7%? Can you watch a person speaking in a foreign language and understand 93%?

The implications

Whilst the exact numbers may be challenged, the important points can easily be lost in the debate about how valid or not the study was.

Useful extensions to this understanding are:

  • It's not just words: a lot is communication comes through non-verbal communication.
  • Without seeing and hearing non-verbals, it is easier to misunderstand the words.
  • When we are unsure about words and when we trust the other person less, we pay more attention to what we hear and see.

So what?

Beware of words-only communications like email. It is very easy to misunderstand what is said, even if emoticons (smileys) are used.

When you feel that a person is not telling the truth, check out the alignment between words, voice and body.

See also

Using Body Language

Mehrabian's site is at: http://www.kaaj.com/psych/

Mehrabian, Albert, and Ferris, Susan R. “Inference of Attitudes from Nonverbal Communication in Two Channels,” Journal of Consulting Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 3, June 1967, pp. 248-258

Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages, Wadsworth, California: Belmont

Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Aldine-Atherton, Illinois: Chicago

 


 

  © Syque 2002-2007

TOP

Massive Content -- Maximum Speed