How we change what others think, feel, believe and do

| Menu | Quick | Books | Share | Search | Settings |

Likert Scale


Explanations > Social ResearchMeasurement > Likert Scale

Description | Example | Question selection | Discussion | See also



The Likert Scale is an ordered, one-dimensional scale from which respondents choose one option that best aligns with their view.

There are typically between four and seven options. Five is very common (see arguments about this below).

All options usually have labels, although sometimes only a few are offered and the others are implied.

A common form is an assertion, with which the person may agree or disagree to varying degrees.

In scoring, numbers are usually assigned to each option (such as 1 to 5).



5-point traditional Likert scale:

Tend to
Tend to
I like going to Chinese restaurants [  ] [  ] [  ] [  ] [  ]


5-point Likert-type scale, not all labeled:

  Good   Neutral   Bad
When I think about Chinese restaurants I feel [  ] [  ] [  ] [  ] [  ]


6-point Likert-type scale:

  Never Infrequently Infrequently Sometimes Frequently Always
I feel happy when entering a Chinese Restaurant O O O O O O


Question selection

Questions may be selected by a mathematical process, as follows:

  1. Generate a lot of questions -- more than you need.
  2. Get a group of judges to score the questionnaire.
  3. Sum the scores for all items.
  4. Calculate the intercorrelations between all pairs of items.
  5. Reject questions that have a low correlation with the sum of the scores.
  6. For each item, calculate the t-value for the top quarter and bottom quarter of the judges and reject questions with lower t-values (higher t-values show questions with higher discrimination).


The Likert scale is named after its originator, Rensis Likert.

A benefit is that questions used are usually easy to understand and so lead to consistent answers. A disadvantage is that only a few options are offered, with which respondents may not fully agree.

As with any other measurement, the options should be a carefully selected set of questions or statements that act together to give a useful and coherent picture.

A problem can occur where people may become influenced by the way they have answered previous questions. For example if they have agreed several times in a row, they may continue to agree. They may also deliberately break the pattern, disagreeing with a statement with which they might otherwise have agreed. This patterning can be broken up by asking reversal questions, where the sense of of the question is reversed - thus in the example above, a reversal might be 'I do not like going to Chinese restaurants'. Sometimes the 'do not' is emphasized, to ensure people notice it, although this can cause bias and hence needs great care.

There is much debate about how many choices should be offered. An odd number of choices allows people to sit on the fence. An even number forces people to make a choice, whether this reflects their true position or not.

Some people do not like taking extreme choices as this may make them appear as if they are totally sure when they realize that there are always valid opposing views to many questions. They may also prefer to be thought of as moderate rather than extremist. They thus are much less likely to choose the extreme options. This is a good argument to offer seven choices rather than five. It is also possible to note people who do not make extreme choices and 'stretch' their scores, although this can be a somewhat questionable activity.

[For these reasons, I have a personal preference for six options].

 There is also debate as to what is a true Likert scale and what is a 'Likert-type' scale. Likert's original scale (in his PhD thesis) was bipolar, with five points running from one extreme to another, through a neutral central position, ranging from 'Strongly Agree' to 'Strongly Disagree'.

The Likert scale is also called the summative scale, as the result of a questionnaire is often achieved by summing numerical assignments to the responses given.

See also

Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, Archives of Psychology, No.140

Site Menu

| Home | Top | Quick Links | Settings |

Main sections: | Disciplines | Techniques | Principles | Explanations | Theories |

Other sections: | Blog! | Quotes | Guest articles | Analysis | Books | Help |

More pages: | Contact | Caveat | About | Students | Webmasters | Awards | Guestbook | Feedback | Sitemap | Changes |

Settings: | Computer layout | Mobile layout | Small font | Medium font | Large font | Translate |



Please help and share:


Quick links


* Argument
* Brand management
* Change Management
* Coaching
* Communication
* Counseling
* Game Design
* Human Resources
* Job-finding
* Leadership
* Marketing
* Politics
* Propaganda
* Rhetoric
* Negotiation
* Psychoanalysis
* Sales
* Sociology
* Storytelling
* Teaching
* Warfare
* Workplace design


* Assertiveness
* Body language
* Change techniques
* Closing techniques
* Conversation
* Confidence tricks
* Conversion
* Creative techniques
* General techniques
* Happiness
* Hypnotism
* Interrogation
* Language
* Listening
* Negotiation tactics
* Objection handling
* Propaganda
* Problem-solving
* Public speaking
* Questioning
* Using repetition
* Resisting persuasion
* Self-development
* Sequential requests
* Storytelling
* Stress Management
* Tipping
* Using humor
* Willpower


+ Principles


* Behaviors
* Beliefs
* Brain stuff
* Conditioning
* Coping Mechanisms
* Critical Theory
* Culture
* Decisions
* Emotions
* Evolution
* Gender
* Games
* Groups
* Habit
* Identity
* Learning
* Meaning
* Memory
* Motivation
* Models
* Needs
* Personality
* Power
* Preferences
* Research
* Relationships
* SIFT Model
* Social Research
* Stress
* Trust
* Values


* Alphabetic list
* Theory types


Guest Articles


| Home | Top | Menu | Quick Links |

© Changing Works 2002-
Massive Content — Maximum Speed